Practicing Environmental Law
"Environmental Law" covers a range of issues involving everything
from liability due to industrial accidents to zoning as it affects development
of shopping centers, houses, and other facilities. Neil Yoskin, who is
interviewed below, specializes in an interdisciplinary field called Coastal Zone
Management, which combines a number of issues that relate to the use of natural
resources along the oceanfront.
As is in other areas of law, many environmental attorneys rarely, if ever,
work in court. Instead, they spend much of their time working with clients,
researching case law and writing legal briefs in preparation for resolving
issues or applying for licenses and other regulatory approvals with agencies
from local planning boards to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. They
also may participate in the drafting of new regulations.
Environmental attorneys work for private citizens, public interest groups,
corporations, or real estate developers. They may also work for the government,
"sitting on the other side of the table" in discussions with private
attorneys.

Interview: Neil Yoskin
Neil Yoskin is a partner in the law firm of Bennett and Yoskin in Princeton,
N.J. When he was "very young," he began thinking about law as a
career. "My father wanted very badly for me to be a lawyer," Mr.
Yoskin remembers. "To the point where he would bring home books for me
about famous lawyers. By the time I was 14 or 15 years old, it was difficult for
me to think of being anything other than a lawyer."
Mr. Yoskin majored in international relations at the University of Virginia
before attending Temple University's School of Law in Philadelphia. In his first
job after receiving his law degree, he was a representative at the 1975 United
Nations Law of the Sea Conference in New York. "I was very interested in
international relations and international law and marine affairs, and this was a
good way to combine them," he explains. Next, he worked for a year in a
Philadelphia law firm specializing in labor unions, then became an attorney with
the New Jersey Office of Coastal Zone Management, a branch of the state's
Department of Environmental Protection.
After six years in government, Mr. Yoskin returned to private practice as an
environmental attorney. In 1988, he was a founding partner in the Trenton, N.J.,
law firm of Picco Mach Herbert Kennedy Jaffe and Yoskin. He remained there until
he co-founded Bennett and Yoskin in 1995.

Q: How is it that you can to specialize in coastal zone issues?
The public policy issues that are at the root of coastal zone law fascinate
me. For example, if you're considering building a marine terminal, you have
competing policy issues around the fact that a lot of commerce is least
expensively moved by water. So, a lot of companies want to move high volume, low
profit commodities - like sand and stone - by water. You're trying to balance
that with the fact that to build facilities to handle shipping you sometimes
have to dredge or fill a water body, and that has an adverse environmental
impact. So what you're trying to gauge is how adverse is the impact, and whether
the impact from the project is more than offset by the advantages.
You know, in any profession you're dealing with a particular set of
circumstances. If you're fascinated by airplanes, then it's interesting to do
aviation law. If you're fascinated by medicine, it's interesting to be a
personal injury lawyer. But if you're not fascinated by those things, being a
lawyer can be very dreary. I think any profession is like that. There are things
in any job that are enjoyable and others which aren't. What I tried to do was
maximize the things that are enjoyable to me.
On a very practical level, if you're an environmental lawyer, if you're
wetlands lawyer, you have to go see the site with a client, it's great. You
know, on a nice day you're down at the shore, walking through the sand dunes or
walking through a wetland. How many people get to do that?

Q: To you, what was the hardest part of becoming an attorney?
Law school.
Q: Why?
There's just an enormous, enormous amount of work to do in law school. It's
not always intellectually stimulating. So, that would be the hardest part of
becoming a lawyer.
Many law schools adhere to the Socratic method of teaching - meaning that the
professors teach through dialog with the student. The student must know the
material. That means in any given course you might have between six and ten
cases to learn to be prepared for a particular class. It used to be common that
professors would berate students and embarrass them if they weren't prepared.
That's not as common as it used to be. But this was what you were trying to do
each and every day. You just had an enormous, enormous amount of reading. You
would generally read and brief cases, meaning you would take notes and prepare
summaries of cases before class, so that the class was more meaningful to you.

Q: What is a typical day like for you?
Today's a good example of the typical day. I got here at 7:30 this morning
because it's Monday, and Mondays are busy days. Clients call a lot. And like
many people in lots of professions, I find that I can sit down and just get some
things done quietly from 7:30 to 8:30 in the morning and then after 5:30 at
night.
So, I got here at 7:30. I entered my billing time from last Friday on my
computer. Then I have a very important meeting at New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection today at 2. I have a client who is developing one of
the largest pieces of urban waterfront land in the world. This meeting has a lot
of participants, so I drafted an agenda for the meeting and I faxed it to
everybody.
In a typical day, I'll get between 40 and 50 telephone calls. I'll try and
take them if I can. If I'm doing something on a deadline, I'll have messages
taken for me. I know that's a lot of calls, and I spend most of my day on the
phone. Which means you have to work at night a lot. I usually do multiple tasks
at once: I'm writing a letter at the same time that I'm talking to people on the
phone. I may be actually composing more than one letter at the same time.
The one thing I find that I must set time aside for is brief writing. A brief
is a document that you submit to a court which analyzes factual issues in the
context of legal precedence. Brief writing really requires concentration and
thought and that absolutely requires that you set aside time for it.
One of the truths I have found is that there's not enough time in the day to
get everything done that you want to do. If you're a high-energy person that's
okay, because you can work at night and work in the morning. A common complaint
I've heard among professionals is that nobody has the time to do things as
carefully or as thoughtfully as they'd like to do.

Q: You've been a lawyer for twenty years, now. Is being a lawyer as you
thought it would be?
Yes and no. The yes is that the law is much as I thought it would be. The
issues of dealing with the law are much as I thought they would be. What I
couldn't possibly know, because I was young, is that dealing with clients and
dealing with the business aspects of law are much bigger aspects of law practice
than I ever thought they would be.
Law is a very personal, hands-on business in the sense that you're dealing
with people whose property is at stake. I don't do criminal law, so I'm not
dealing with people whose freedom is at stake. But I'm dealing with property
owners, and there are very few things that are more important to people than
their property rights. So, I'm dealing with people who are frequently upset,
because they're dealing with a bureaucracy that's trying to deprive them of the
use of their property in some way.
When you're a lawyer, when you're a partner in a law firm, you're also a
businessman. Lawyers can be excellent lawyers but be lousy businessmen. That's
one thing that people don't always understand.

Q: So, what is the best part of your job?
Well, right now, in a new practice, it's not the money, although at one time
it was.
I think the best part of my job is doing it well. When you've done something
as well as you feel you can do it, that feels good. For example, I've argued in
the State Supreme Court. I prepared for it well and I presented it well. I was
incredibly charged and excited when I left that day. That kind of thing is
probably the best part. That and enjoying personal relationships or developing
personal relationships with clients.

Q: What's the hardest part of the job?
To me, the hardest part is dealing with the frustration of not getting
everything done the way I'd like to get it done. At the end of the day, there's
always 12 things that I still want to do.
Another frustrating part is losing cases that you should win. One of the
things that lawyers discover is the courts are fallible and they make mistakes.
It's not just a matter of judgment on my part. There are certain realities you
have to face, particularly in environmental law. For example, when you litigate
with the government, by and large government wins. Frequently they shouldn't,
and that's very frustrating.
It's not because you haven't done your job, it's just because the court
figures, "Ah, it's DEP and they must know what they're doing." I say
that casually, but it's a reality that's well recognized by lawyers. It's a
fundamental principal of administrative law that courts assume that agencies
have greater expertise in the matter than they do and they will therefore defer
to the agency action unless it is clearly arbitrary and capricious. That's the
standard. What frustrates me the most is when I can't convince somebody of a
position that I know to be correct.

Q: So despite all the intellectual power that goes with the law, it's
actually a very human thing.
Yes, very human, and that's a fascinating thing to find out.
Q: Looking back, if you had it all to do over again, what would you do
differently?
I would try to get a judicial clerkship: work for a judge. It took me a long
time to learn about law and procedure and all the things that at one time did
not interest me - like the rules of civil procedure - that I now find
interesting. I think the most educational thing you can do, the thing that can
best prepare you to be a lawyer, is to work for a judge.

Q: What advice would you give to someone who wants to be an attorney? What
kind of things should they do?
They should try to work in a law office before they go to law school to see
what it's like. Often, their county bar associations will have placement
programs, but the best thing to do is just call or write the law firms in their
communities. If their parents know a lawyer, that's a good way to approach. It's
the best way, really. They may get little or no money and they're certainly not
going to have positions of authority, but it's still a good way to learn.
Also, students should go to court. Courtrooms are open; you can just go to
trials. It's hard to get away from school or know when there's going to be a
trial, so I guess the best way to do it is through school. But somehow, go to
court.
If they want to really be excited about the law, students should go to the
Supreme Court, at least in their state, and see oral argument. That's where the
law is at its most pure.
There's an understanding most lawyers share that at some point you have to
drop the emotional arguments and deal with the law. People think that the law is
cold in that respect, but that ultimately is the way the system works best.
Where that takes place is in appellate argument. When you get to appellate
argument, particularly at the Supreme Court, you have a level of knowledge and
understanding of the case that's generally very high and very refined.
It's not television law, because it's not a trial. Trials are very
interesting to see because of the lack of flow in them. I think a lot of people
learned that from the OJ Simpson trial. There's always motions, there's always
objections, there's always postponements. In the Supreme Court, you have a half
an hour to make your case. It's the kind of experience that makes you want to be
a lawyer.
Information from: http://www.futurescan.com/attorney/yoskin.html
|