Whittier College's response to COVID-19 and plans for Fall 2020
Contribute to the Student Emergency Fund and help students cover unprecedented expenses
Chosen by the Title IX Coordinator, or their designee, this person or persons determine responsibility for alleged policy violations and imposes sanctions.
Any person asked by the Complainant, Responding Party, or a witness to assist the resolution process. The Advisor is an inactive participant. Advisors are not permitted to directly address the Adjudication Party during formal Title IX proceedings. The Advisor may guide the person they are advising through the process, help them formulate questions, and help the person understand the Whittier College Sexual Misconduct Policy. Complaint or Responding Party may choose to have, but are not limited to, a trained faculty or staff member as their Advisor.
The person designated to decide appeals submitted by a Complainant or Responding Party following a resolution of allegations of Sexual Misconduct. In the case of students, that person is the Associate Dean of Students. Depending on the circumstances of each case, the College reserves its right to select a different Appeals Officer to decide an appeal.
The following excerpts are only partially explanatory of certain California laws pertaining to sexual and interpersonal misconduct. These excerpts are not intended to be an exhaustive description or list of California laws pertaining to sexual misconduct, inappropriate or criminal sexual behavior or interpersonal misconduct.
Sexual Assault includes rape, statutory rape, rape in concert, incest, sodomy, lewd or lascivious acts upon a child, oral copulation, sexual penetration, child molestation and the following:
Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the following circumstances:
California law also states that “The essential guilt of rape consists in the outrage to the person and feelings of the victim of the rape. Any sexual penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime” (Penal Code section 263). California law further defines both marital rape (Penal Code section 262) and “statutory rape” (Penal Code section 261.5).
Though laws vary from state to state, intercourse in which Consent was not obtained or was obtained under coercive conditions will usually be considered rape.
The governing boards of independent postsecondary institutions shall adopt a policy concerning Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence and Stalking, as defined in the federal Higher Education Act of 1965 involving a Student, both on and off campus. This policy shall include an affirmative Consent standard in the determination of whether Consent was given by both parties to sexual activity.
“Affirmative Consent” means affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity. It is the responsibility of each person involved in the sexual activity to ensure that they have the affirmative Consent of the other or others to engage in the sexual activity. Lack of protest or resistance does not mean Consent, nor does silence mean Consent. Affirmative Consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual activity and can be revoked at any time. The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of Consent.
In prosecutions under Section 261, 262, 286, 287 or 289, in which Consent is at issue, “Consent” shall be defined to mean positive cooperation in act or attitude pursuant to an exercise of free will. The person must act freely and voluntarily and have knowledge of the nature of the act or transaction involved.
A current or previous dating or marital relationship shall not be sufficient to constitute Consent where Consent is at issue in a prosecution under Section 261, 262, 286, 287 or 289. Nothing in this section shall affect the admissibility of evidence or the burden of proof on the issue of Consent. In prosecutions under Section 261, 262, 286, 287 or 289, in which Consent is at issue, evidence that the victim suggested, requested or otherwise communicated to the defendant that the defendant use a condom or other birth control device, without additional evidence of Consent, is not sufficient to constitute Consent.
The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Crime Statistics Act (20 USC § 1092(f)), also known as “Clery” or “the Clery Act,” requires U.S. colleges and universities that receive federal financial assistance to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. The Clery Act is enforced by the United States Department of Education. At Whittier College, Campus Safety maintains compliance with the Clery Act by collecting data and reporting it in the Annual Security Report and on the Whittier College website.
Coercion is unreasonable pressure used to compel another individual to participate in sexual activity. This can include a wide range of behaviors, including intimidation, manipulation, threats, and blackmail. A person’s words or conduct are sufficient to constitute coercion if they unreasonably impair another individual’s freedom of will and ability to choose whether or not to engage in sexual activity. Examples of coercion include threatening to “out” someone based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression and threatening to harm oneself if the other party does not engage in the sexual activity. When someone indicates, verbally or physically, that they do not want to engage in a particular sexual activity, that they want to stop a particular activity, or that they do not want to go past a certain point of sexual interaction, continued activity or pressure to continue beyond that point can be coercive. The College will evaluate the following in determining whether coercion was used: (a) the frequency of the application of pressure, (b) the intensity of the pressure, (c) the degree of isolation of the person being pressured, and (4) the duration of the pressure.
One who submits an informal or formal complaint of Sexual Misconduct to a Title IX Coordinator, or to any Mandated Reporters as described on page 7 of this Policy.
An affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity. It is the responsibility of each person involved in the sexual activity to ensure that they have the affirmative consent of the other(s) to engage in the sexual activity. The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent. It is not an excuse that the Responding Party was reckless or intoxicated and, therefore, did not realize the incapacity of the other party. The following are essential components of Consent:
Affirmative consent is not indefinite and must be throughout the activity. Consent may be withdrawn by any party at any time. Recognizing the dynamic nature of sexual activity, individuals choosing to engage in sexual activity must evaluate consent in an ongoing manner and communicate clearly throughout all stages of sexual activity. Withdrawal of consent can be an expressed “no” or can be based on an outward demonstration that conveys that an individual is hesitant, confused, uncertain, or is no longer a mutual participant. Once consent is withdrawn, the sexual activity must cease within a reasonably immediate time and not resumed until the requirements above are met again.
Consent is not unlimited, and reasonable conditions on consent can be determined by the parties. Consent to one form of sexual contact does not constitute consent to all forms of sexual contact, nor does consent to sexual activity with one person constitute consent to activity with any other person. Each participant in a sexual encounter must consent to each form of sexual contact with each participant.
The use or threat of physical violence and/or imposing on someone physically to gain sexual access. Consent obtained by force is not valid. For the use of force to be demonstrated, there is no requirement that a Complainant resist the sexual advance or request. However, evidence of resistance by the Complainant will be viewed as indicative of a lack of consent.
An external individual professionally trained to adjudicate student disciplinary matters. This adjudicator has the authority to take testimony and evidence and make a determination on an allegation. This adjudicator will be assigned to and briefed on a given case as determined by the Title IX Coordinator.
The use of implied threats, whether physical, mental or emotional, to gain sexual access. Consent obtained by Intimidation is not valid.
A state where an individual is physically helpless and/or cannot make an informed and rational decision to engage in sexual activity because of a lack of conscious understanding of the fact, nature, or extent of the act (e.g., who, what, when, where, why, or how relating to the sexual interaction). For example, an individual is incapacitated, and therefore unable to give consent, if the individual is asleep, unconscious, or otherwise unaware that sexual activity is occurring. An individual will also be considered incapacitated if the person cannot understand the nature of the activity or communicate as the result of a mental or physical condition.
Incapacitation may result from the use of alcohol, drugs, or other medication. Consumption of alcohol or other drugs alone is insufficient to establish incapacitation. The impact of alcohol and drugs varies from person to person, and evaluating incapacitation requires an assessment of how the consumption of alcohol and/or drugs impacts an individual’s
It is not a valid excuse that the Responding Party believed that the Complainant affirmatively consented to the sexual activity if the Responding Party knew or reasonably should have known that the Complainant was incapacitated. Whether the Responding Party reasonably should have known that the Complainant was incapacitated will be evaluated using an objective reasonable person standard. The Responding Party being intoxicated by drugs or alcohol is no defense to any violation of this Policy and does not diminish one’s responsibility to take reasonable steps to determine the other’s incapacitation or to obtain consent.
It is the responsibility of each party to be aware of the intoxication level of the other party before engaging in sexual activity. In general, sexual activity while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs poses a risk to all parties. If there is any doubt as to the level or extent of the other individual’s intoxication, it is safest to forgo or cease any sexual contact or activity.
Means the individual(s) whose behavior is alleged to have violated the Student Code of Conduct.
Sexual misconduct as used in this Policy is an umbrella term intended to include sexual behavior or behavior on the basis of sex/gender or sexual/gender identity that includes but is not limited to the prohibited conduct set forth in the next section of this Policy. Sexual Misconduct violations may be found regardless of the sex, gender, sexual orientation and/or gender identity of those involved.
The body of individuals trained to adjudicate student disciplinary matters. Each hearing board will generally consist of at least one faculty member and at least one staff member, along with a designated board chair who can wither be a faculty or staff member. The members of the Student Conduct Review Board assigned to a given case are determined by the Title IX Coordinator.
Title IX is a federal statute that provides, "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance..." 20 U.S.C. § 1681. Sexual harassment and sexual misconduct are forms of sex discrimination prohibited by Title IX and include acts of sexual violence. Students of all gender identities are protected from sexual harassment and/or violence in all educational programs and activities operated by Whittier College.
A member of the College staff or faculty charged with the responsibility to investigate allegations of Sexual Misconduct under this Policy. Title IX Investigators receive annual training on conducting and documenting adequate, reliable, and impartial investigations. While the College conducts most of its investigations allegations through its own Title IX investigators, it has the discretion to hire non-College employees to conduct investigations allegations when appropriate.
Person or persons who are identified as an individual(s) who may have relevant information to the facts of the case. This person or persons typically have knowledge of the event from personal observation or experience.
This policy was updated on February 5, 2020